With the explosion of cell phones in the consumer marketplace, texting and driving has emerged as a national health crisis for individual motorists, the public, and the courts. In 2013, 10 percent of all fatal crashes involved distraction, resulting in the deaths of 3,154 people. Additionally, it is estimated that another 424,000 people were injured in accidents involving distracted drivers.1 In addition to texting while driving, other types of distracted driving include talking on cell phones, eating, using in-dash electronics, and any other activity that takes a driver's attention away from the road.2
In response to the problems presented by texting and driving, 46 states and the District of Columbia have instituted laws forbidding the action, criminalizing texting and driving as at least an infraction.3 At the same time, other forms of distracted driving, including using social media applications such as Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, SnapChat and recently, Pokemon Go, have emerged as major problems in their own right.4 In a study recently completed by Liberty Mutual Insurance, a survey of 2,500 teenagers revealed that almost 70 percent admitted to using social media apps while they drive.5 In another survey completed by the National Safety Council of 2,409 drivers of all ages, 74 percent of those who were surveyed indicated that they would use Facebook while they drove.6
Distracted Driving vs. DUI: Levels of Impairment
A 2006 study looked at the impairment levels of people who were using cell phones versus people who were intoxicated while driving. The University of Utah researchers used a driving simulator and compared study participants who were talking on their cell phones versus those who were legally intoxicated. The researchers looked at results using the simulator involving 49 adult participants who ranged in age from 22 to 45. They first obtained baseline driving results, then looked at driving while using cell phones and finally, driving with blood alcohol concentrations of 0.08 percent over a 3-day period.7 By looking at data obtained from driving profiles the researchers created using 10-second epochs, the researchers found that cell phone users, regardless of whether or not they were using hands-free or handheld devices, showed greater levels of driver impairment than did the drivers who were intoxicated by alcohol.8
Injury and Fatality Statistics for Distracted Driving Vs. Drunk Driving
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that distracted driving injures 1,161 people and kills eight every day in the U.S.9 By comparison, the agency reports that 28 people are killed every day in accidents involving drunk drivers.10 While the percentages of people using cell phones while driving has increased, drinking and driving has decreased.11, 12
Overview of State Laws: Distracted Driving vs. DUI Penalties in California and Alaska
The penalties for texting and driving vary from state to state. While the act is banned in 46 states, some jurisdictions, such as California, make texting and driving only an infraction. In California, a first offense is punishable by a fine of $20, and subsequent convictions are punishable by fines of $50.13
By comparison, Alaska treats texting while driving quite harshly, along with using other electronic devices while operating a motor vehicle. If a person does not injure another while texting and driving, he or she may still be convicted of a class A misdemeanor carrying a fine of up to $10,000 and imprisonment in a county jail of up to one year.14 If a person is injured in an accident caused by someone who was texting while driving in Alaska, the driver may be convicted of a class C felony, and if a person is killed, the driver may be convicted of a class A felony, making the felony sentencing range anywhere from 5 years for a class C conviction up to 20 years for a class A conviction and a fine of up to $50,000 for a class C conviction and up to $250,000 for a class A conviction.
As compared to its treatment of texting while driving, California takes a much harsher approach to people who are convicted of driving under the influence. For a first offense, a person may receive up to 6 months in jail and a fine of up to $1,000.If the DUI offense resulted in an injury, then the person may either be charged with a misdemeanor or a felony as a wobbler offense. A felony conviction can result in up to 3 years in jail along with a fine of up to $5,000.16
Distracted Driving: Does the Punishment Fit the Crime?
In states like California, which make texting while driving only a traffic infraction carrying very minimal fines, it is interesting to note the disparity between it and a DUI conviction in the same state. While texting and driving may cause greater driver impairment and potentially serious injuries or deaths, it is treated as a much less serious offense. In Alaska, by contrast, texting while driving is treated very seriously, potentially carrying penalties that are as great or greater than those for various levels of drunk driving offenses. The remainder of the states represents a mishmash, ranging between the four with no penalties at all to Alaska with the potential for a serious felony conviction.
Distracted driving is potentially just as or more dangerous than driving while under the influence of alcohol. With millions of people routinely texting while driving or using social media applications while driving, the roads are becoming more dangerous. Still, the states have yet to catch up to the dangers posed by these forms of distracted driving with a majority treating them as minor infractions. States should review the research and consider bringing parity between their DUI statutes and penalties with their statutes criminalizing texting and driving. An added emphasis on educational campaigns about texting while driving along with campaigns about using social media apps while driving may also be added steps that states should consider. Failing to take further action to curb these forms of distracted driving could be potentially disastrous.
1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR STATISTICS AND ANALYSIS, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, [hereinafter NHTSA 2013 report] available at http://www.distraction.gov/downloads/pdfs/Distracted_Driving_2013_Resear....
2. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, INJURY PREVENTION and CONTROL, MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY, DISTRACTED DRIVING, 1 (2016)[hereinafter CDC report] available at http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/distracted_driving/.
3. Governors Highway Safety Association, Distracted Driving Laws (2016), available at http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/cellphone_laws.html.
4. Liberty Mutual Insurance, Teen Driving Study Reveals “App and Drive” is New Danger Among Teens, New Worry for Parents (2016), available at https://libertymutualgroup.com/about-lm/news/news-release-archive/articl....
6. National Safety Council, Distracted Driving Public Opinion Poll (March 2016), available at http://www.nsc.org/NewsDocuments/2016/DD-Methodology-Summary-033116.pdf.
7. David L. Strayer et al., Fatal Distraction? A Comparison of the Cell-Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver (2006), available at http://www.psych.utah.edu/AppliedCognitionLab/DrivingAssessment2003.pdf.
9. Supra note 2.
10. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL, MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY, IMPAIRED DRIVING, 1 (2016), available at http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_fact....
11. Distraction.gov, What is Distracted Driving?, http://www.distraction.gov/stats-research-laws/facts-and-statistics.html (last visited Aug. 2, 2016).
12. Matthew Chambers et al., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS, DRUNK DRIVING BY THENUMBERS (2016), available at http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/by....
13. Cal. Veh. Code § 23123.5(d).
14. Alaska Stat. §§ 28.35.161, 12.55.035, 12.55.135, 12.55.125.
15. Cal. Veh. Code §§ 23152, 23153.
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
Copyright © 2018 · Steven Sweat
The next time you reach for your cell phone while driving, pretend it's a bottle of beer. You wouldn't take a swig of alcohol while driving, but did you know texting while driving could be even more dangerous?
Research proves dangers of texting
In October 2011, the first research study involving actual moving vehicles (not simulators) was conducted by researchers at the Texas A&M Transportation Institute to evaluate the dangers of texting and driving. The results were even worse than previously thought. Drivers on a closed course were evaluated for response times while reading and writing texts while driving. Their responses to a flashing light were measured as they navigated an obstacle course — first without texting, then while texting. It took texting drivers twice as long to respond to the flashing light. Swerving, high speeds and lane drifting also shot up when drivers' focus was on their phones and not on the road. No surprise, right?
Texting versus drinking
So texting from behind the wheel isn't a good idea, but is it really worse than driving drunk? A 2008 study conducted by the Transport Research Laboratory in London says yes. TRL researchers found that drivers who texted demonstrated reaction times 35 percent worse than when they drove without any distractions at all (compared to 12 percent worse when driving while intoxicated). The researchers discovered that there was a significant decrease in ability to maintain a safe driving distance between vehicles while texting, and that steering control dropped by 91 percent compared to driving with no distractions. Overall, the study concluded that “when texting whilst driving, a driver may present a greater accident risk than when at the legal limit for alcohol consumption.”
With multiple research studies showing that texting while driving causes greater impairment than drinking, wouldn't it make sense for laws to forbid such a dangerous activity? Unfortunately, it depends on where you live. As of March 2013, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reports that text messaging is banned for all drivers in 39 states and the District of Columbia. Additionally, it is against the law for novice drivers to text while driving in five states (Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas) and it's illegal for school bus drivers to text in three states (Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas). That means the roads are full of distracted drivers who can text freely while driving in 11 states.
If you live in a state where texting is still legal, and you're tired of having distracted texting drivers swerve into your lane on a regular basis, do something about it. Contact your state legislators and express your concerns. Demand that action be taken to ban an activity that has been proven to be more dangerous than driving while intoxicated.
For additional information and resources on texting and driving, visit Distraction.gov, the "Official U.S. Government Website for Distracted Driving."
More automotive advice
Just in case: Extended warranty tips
What to do when you need a tow
"Lemon law" and how it protects your purchase